Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Obliquely striated muscles occur in 17+ phyla, likely evolving repeatedly, yet the implications of oblique striation for muscle function are unknown. Contrary to the belief that oblique striation allows high force output over extraordinary length ranges (i.e. superelongation), recent work suggests diversity in operating length ranges and length–force relationships. We hypothesize oblique striation evolved to increase length–force relationship flexibility. We predict that superelongation is not a general characteristic of obliquely striated muscles and instead that length–force relationships vary with operating length range. To test these predictions, we measured length–force relationships of five obliquely striated muscles from inshore longfin squid, Doryteuthis pealeii: tentacle, funnel retractor and head retractor longitudinal fibers, and arm and fin transverse fibers. Consistent with superelongation, the tentacle length–force relationship had a long descending limb, whereas all others exhibited limited descending limbs. The ascending limb at 0.6P0 was significantly broader (P<0.001) for the tentacle length–force relationship (0.43±0.04L0; where L0 is the preparation length that produced peak isometric stress, P0) than for the arm (0.29±0.03L0), head retractor (0.24±0.06L0), fin (0.20±0.04L0) and funnel retractor (0.27±0.03L0). The fin's narrow ascending limb differed significantly from those of the arm (P=0.004) and funnel retractor (P=0.012). We further characterized the tentacle preparation's maximum isometric stress (315±78 kPa), maximum unloaded shortening velocity (2.97±0.55L0 s−1) and ultrastructural traits (compared with the arm), which may explain its broader length–force relationship. Comparison of obliquely striated muscles across taxa revealed length–force relationship diversity, with only two species exhibiting superelongation. 

Abstract Polyamide thin‐film composite (PA‐TFC) membranes make large‐scale desalination effective. Interfacial polymerization (IP) is used to make PA‐TFC membranes, but it may limit the range of monomers that can be used, which hinders progress toward advanced membranes. Layer‐by‐layer (LbL) sequential deposition could circumvent kinetic and thermodynamic limitations of the conventional IP process to facilitate incorporation of different co‐monomers into the membrane. The selective layer needs to be deposited onto a microporous support, but depositing LbL coatings on microporous supports often results in defective membranes. Using a poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) primer between the support and the LbL polyamide layer may prevent defect formation. The water permeance and salt rejection of a three layer, PVA‐primed, LbL‐based PA‐TFC membrane are discussed and compared to a membrane made without the PVA primer and a commercially available membrane. Mass transfer resistances are analyzed using a series resistance model and appear to be small or even negligible compared to that of the polyamide layer. Incorporation of a sulfonated co‐monomer into the polyamide via LbL is reported. The combination of a PVA primer layer and LbL sequential deposition may expand the range of co‐monomers that could be used relative to polyamide membranes prepared by the conventional IP process.